Royal Flying Doctors Service
UX/UI & Accessible Design
Overview
Royal Flying Doctor Service Building a healthcare platform from scratch for regional and diverse WA communities.
UX/UI & Accessible Design | 2025 | Limitless Devs
RFDS had no existing digital system for their regional clinics. I was brought in to define the website architecture and UX for their rollout, starting with the Goldfields Health Centre as the flagship and scalable foundation for future locations.
My Role
End-to-end UX and design, from discovery workshop through to visual design and accessibility framework.
Disciplines UX/UI Design, Information Architecture and Accessible Design.
A separate development team handled the build. The live site may reflect differences and/or changes made post-handoff.
1
The Challenge
Regional GP care is already hard to access. A confusing or inaccessible website makes it harder.
Challenge
RFDS needed a digital experience that could serve as a full medical practice platform, handle online bookings through HotDoc, and work for a genuinely diverse patient base including Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities, multicultural users, and people with varying levels of digital confidence.
Insight
There was no existing system to work from, no established patterns to follow, and the solution had to scale across future clinic locations without a rebuild every time. It had to feel local and trusted while sitting within the broader RFDS brand.

2
Research
Getting into the room with the people who would actually run the clinics was invaluable.
Discovery
I ran an on-site workshop with RFDS stakeholders to understand operational needs, patient demographics, and the long-term rollout plan. The diversity of the patient base was broader than the brief had suggested, with real variation in digital literacy, language, and cultural background.
What I found
Trust was a bigger factor than I initially weighted. RFDS is WA's most trusted charity, and patients come to the website carrying that expectation. Any friction or confusion would erode it fast.
Community, accessibility, and cultural inclusivity needed to be thoughtful considerations, designed in from the start, shaping every IA and accessibility decision I made.
The workshop also surfaced the real scope of the scalability challenge. The system needed to support multiple clinic locations, different doctor rosters, evolving services, and integration with HotDoc, without a structural rebuild each time a new clinic came online.
Who I was designing for
The primary users were regional and remote patients seeking GP services, many of whom were coming to RFDS as a first point of contact with no prior experience of the clinic or its digital systems. That meant the experience had to work for people with varying levels of digital confidence, accessibility needs, and familiarity with how to navigate healthcare online.
User Journey
The core user need was simple: understand what's available and book an appointment with as little friction as possible. I designed the journey around three questions in sequence:
What services are available?
|
Is this clinic right for me?
|
How do I book?
The workshop made it clear that any break in the booking flow would create confusion. For users already uncertain about navigating digital healthcare, being redirected mid-journey was a real drop-off risk.
3
The Solution
Accessibility and cultural inclusivity work best when they shape decisions before you open a design tool.
Design Approach
The system needed to work for multiple clinic locations, diverse users, and internal teams managing content on an ongoing basis. Every design decision was made with that in mind.
- Scalable visual and interaction framework aligned with the RFDS brand
- Inclusive imagery to support connection across diverse users
- Information architecture for both first-time and returning patients
Booking Integration
An external redirect breaks trust, especially for users already uncertain about navigating digital healthcare. Keeping HotDoc embedded meant patients never felt handed off to something unfamiliar.
Accessibility
For a user base that includes people navigating healthcare in a second language, with limited digital confidence, or using assistive technology, accessibility couldn't be a checklist. It had to be the foundation.
- Plain language and symbols alongside text to support comprehension
- Sufficient colour contrast and accessible typography across devices
- Low cognitive load through clear content structure and navigation
- Keyboard accessibility with clear focus states and logical navigation
- Semantic structure and meaningful labelling for screen reader support
Community
Representation matters, particularly for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities and multicultural users who don't always see themselves reflected in healthcare digital spaces. The visual direction was intentional, using inclusive imagery that reflects the diversity of the people actually using the service. The Acknowledgement of Country in the footer was part of that cultural and community inclusivity.
As a placeholder, I used vector graphics to represent the kind of visual language I had in mind. The longer term vision is to commission a local Goldfields artist to create original artwork that bridges the digital platform and the physical clinic space, connecting the mural on the wall to the website the patient visited before walking through the door. That kind of continuity between digital and physical touch points is something I'd love to see realised as the rollout grows.
4
Impact
Post-launch, RFDS reported patients responded well, with low friction in accessing GP care.
The platform gave patients a clear, accessible pathway from information to booking, reducing barriers for a user base that includes people who've never booked a GP appointment online before.
Scalability
The design system is a working foundation for future clinic rollouts, flexible enough to adapt to different regional locations and communities without a structural rebuild each time a new clinic comes online.
Reflection
This project reinforced something I keep coming back to in my practice: accessibility and cultural inclusivity aren't features you layer on top of a design. They're most effective when they shape the decisions you make before you open a design tool. The on-site workshop made that possible here because it got me in front of the actual complexity of the problem early.
If I were to iterate further, I'd push harder on community co-design, particularly with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community members, and explore how that commissioned local artwork vision could be built into the scalable framework from the start rather than as a future consideration.
